Document of bibliographic reference 320338

BibliographicReference record

Type
Bibliographic resource
Type of document
Journal article
BibLvlCode
AS
Title
Comparison between single and multi-locus approaches for specimen identification in Mytilus mussels
Abstract
Mytilus mussels have been the object of much research given their sentinel role in coastal ecosystems and significant value as an aquaculture resource appreciated for both, its flavour and nutritional content. Some of the most-studied Mytilus species are M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis, M. chilensis and M. trossulus. As species identification based on morphological characteristics of Mytilus specimens is difficult, molecular markers are often used. Single-locus markers can give conflicting results when used independently; not all markers differentiate among all species, and the markers target genomic regions with different evolutionary histories. We evaluated the concordance between the PCR-RFLP markers most commonly-used for species identification in mussels within the Mytilus genus (Me15-16, ITS, mac-1, 16S rRNA and COI) when used alone (mono-locus approach) or together (multi-locus approach). In this study, multi-locus strategy outperformed the mono-locus methods, clearly identifying all four species and also showed similar specimen identification performance than a 49 SNPs panel. We hope that these findings will contribute to a better understanding of DNA marker-based analysis of Mytilus taxa. These results support the use of a multi-locus approach when studying this important marine resource, including research on food quality and safety, sustainable production and conservation.
WebOfScience code
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000508904100023
Bibliographic citation
Larraín, M.A.; González, P.; Pérez, C.; Araneda, C. (2019). Comparison between single and multi-locus approaches for specimen identification in Mytilus mussels. NPG Scientific Reports 9(1): 19714. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55855-8
Topic
Marine
Is peer reviewed
true
Access rights
open access
Is accessible for free
true

Authors

author
Name
María Larraín
author
Name
Pía González
author
Name
Claudio Pérez
author
Name
Cristian Araneda

Links

referenced creativework
type
DOI
accessURL
https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55855-8

Document metadata

date created
2020-01-07
date modified
2020-01-31