Document of bibliographic reference 362091

BibliographicReference record

Type

Bibliographic resource

Type of document

Journal article

BibLvlCode

AS

Title

Taxonomic and otolith shape parameters of nine sympatric catfishes commercially harvested in Pakistan

Abstract

Accurate reorganization of harvested species is essential for appropriate fisheries monitoring but often unnoticed. In this study, an attempt was made to provide an accurate species description based on fish taxonomy and otolith shape parameters of nine sea catfishes living in Pakistan. The lapillus, the largest otolith of catfishes, includes the position of the umbo, the structure of the anterior mesial projection (amp), the incisura linea basalis (ilb) and sulcus lapilli marks (slm) in nine ariid catfishes were evaluated. Discriminant function analysis was performed using twenty-two morphometric parameters showed significant variations between the length of the maxillary barbel, adipose length and preorbital length, which were highlighted as basic discriminating characters. Species without barbells, such as Batrachocephalus mino and Osteogeneiosus militaris, were found to be distant. The taxonomic characters of the genera Netuma and Plicofollis overlapped due to a short adipose fin length. Nevertheless, species Arius arius, Sciades sona and Nemapterxy caelatus differed in a moderate adipose fin length. The preorbital length of Netuma bilineata has a short and rounded snout, while N. thalassina has a long and pointed snout, which is a distinguishing characteristic of both species. The coincident use of fish taxonomy and otolith shape parameters is an effective tool for catfish identification could be helpful in appropriate fisheries sampling programs and management in Pakistan whenever implemented.

Bibliographic citation

Farooq, N.; Panhwar, S.K. (2023). Taxonomic and otolith shape parameters of nine sympatric catfishes commercially harvested in Pakistan. Croatian Journal of Fisheries 81(1): 23-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cjf-2023-0003

Is peer reviewed

true

Access rights

open access

Is accessible for free

true