Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Essential fish habitat and marine reserves: Proceedings of the 2nd William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology, November 4-6, 1998, Sarasota, Florida
Coleman, F.C.; Travis, J.; Thistle, A.B. (Ed.) (2000). Essential fish habitat and marine reserves: Proceedings of the 2nd William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology, November 4-6, 1998, Sarasota, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 66(3). Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences: Miami. 525-1009 pp.
Part of: Bulletin of Marine Science. University of Miami Press: Coral Gables. ISSN 0007-4977; e-ISSN 1553-6955, more
Contains:
Agardy, T.S. (2000). Information needs for marine protected areas: scientific and societal. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 875-888, more
Bohnsack, J.A. (2000). A comparison of the short-term impacts of no-take marine reserves and minimum size limits. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 635-650, more
Chiappone, M.; Sullivan Sealy, K.M. (2000). Marine reserve design criteria and measures of success: lessons learned from the Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park, Bahamas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 691-705, more
Collins, M.R.; Rogers, S.G.; Smith, T.I.J.; Moser, M.L. (2000). Primary factors affecting sturgeon populations in the Southeastern United States: fishing mortality and degradation of essential habitats. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 917-928, more
Conover, D.O.; Travis, J.; Coleman, F.C. (2000). Essential Fish Habitat and Marine Reserves: an introduction to the second Mote Symposium in Fisheries Ecology. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 527-534, more
Crowder, L.B.; Lyman, S.J.; Figueira, W.F.; Priddy, J. (2000). Source-sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 799-820, more
Dahlgren, C.P.; Sobel, J. (2000). Designing a Dry Tortugas Ecological Reserve: how big is big enough? …To do what? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 707-719, more
Dayton, P.K.; Sala, E.; Tegner, M.J.; Thrush, S. (2000). Marine reserves: parks, baselines, and fishery enhancement. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 617-634, more
Eklund, A.-M.; McClellan, D.B.; Harper, D.E. (2000). Black grouper aggregations in relation to protected areas within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 721-728, more
Guénette, S.; Pitcher, T.J.; Walters, C.J. (2000). The potential of marine reserves for the management of northern cod in Newfoundland. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 831-852, more
Koenig, C.C.; Coleman, F.C.; Grimes, C.B.; Fitzhugh, G.R.; Scanlon, K.M.; Gledhill, C.T.; Grace, M. (2000). Protection of fish spawning habitat for the conservation of warm-temperate reef-fish fisheries of shelf-edge reefs of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 593-616, more
Lindeman, K.C.; Pugliese, R.; Waugh, G.T.; Ault, J.S. (2000). Developmental patterns within a multispecies reef fishery: management applications for essential fish habitats and protected areas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 929-956, more
Mangel, M. (2000). Trade-offs between fish habitat and fishing mortality and the role of reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 663-674, more
Martell, S.J.D.; Walters, C.J.; Wallace, S.S. (2000). The use of marine protected areas for conservation of lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus). Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 729-743, more
Milon, J.W. (2000). Pastures, fences, tragedies and marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 901-916, more
Murawski, S.A.; Brown, R.; Lai, H.-L.; Rago, P.J.; Hendrickson, L. (2000). Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems: the Georges Bank experience. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 775-798, more
Nowlis, J.S. (2000). Short- and long-term effects of three fishery-management tools on depleted fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 651-662, more
Peterson, C.H.; Summerson, H.C.; Thomson, E.; Lenihan, H.S.; Grabowski, J.; Manning, L.M.; Micheli, F.; Johnson, G. (2000). Synthesis of linkages between benthic and fish communities as a key to protecting essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 759-774, more
Pitcher, T.; Watson, R.; Haggan, N.; Guénette, S.; Kennish, R.; Sumaila, U.R.; Cook, D.; Wilson, K.; Leung, A. (2000). Marine reserves and the restoration of fisheries and marine ecosystems in the South China Sea. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 543-566, more
Rieser, A. (2000). Essential fish habitat as a basis for marine protected areas in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 889-899, more
Roberts, C.M. (2000). Selecting marine reserve locations: optimality versus opportunism. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 581-592, more
Rosenberg, A.A.; Bigford, T.E.; Leathery, S.; Hill, R.L.; Bickers, K. (2000). Ecosystem approaches to fishery management through essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 535-542, more
Simberloff, D. (2000). No reserve is an island: marine reserves and nonindigenous species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 567-580, more
St. Mary, C.M.; Osenberg, C.W.; Frazer, T.K.; Lindberg, W.J. (2000). Stage structure, density dependence and the efficacy of marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 675-690, more
Stockhausen, W.T.; Lipcius, R.N.; Hickey, B.M. (2000). Joint effects of larval dispersal, population regulation, marine reserve design, and exploitation on production and recruitment in the caribbean spiny lobster. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 957-990, more
Trexler, J.C.; Travis, J. (2000). Can marine protected areas restore and conserve stock attributes of reef fishes? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 853-873, more
Walters, C.J. (2000). Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 745-757, more
Warner, R.R.; Swearer, S.E.; Caselle, J.E. (2000). Larval accumulation and retention: implications for the design of marine reserves and essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 821-830, more
Peer reviewed article  

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Coleman, F.C., editor
  • Travis, J., editor
  • Thistle, A.B., editor

Abstract
    (Preface to the proceedings)The use of marine reserves as a fisheries management tool to enhance stocks and protect habitat has gained considerable support from scientists, environmental groups, and the public. The support for their use is born of frustration with more conventional approaches, which have failed to stop the decline of fisheries stocks worldwide. The essential fish habitat provisions in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act ( 1996) provide the legal means of using marine reserves as a management tool in the United States, and the Marine Sanctuaries Act (1972) provided comparable means for protecting unique habitats. The science to support the use of reserves has received strong criticism from extractive users, however, and as a result, the political will to move forward with this tool has been lacking. The second William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology is dedicated to examining these criticisms, addressing the interface between essential habitat and marine reserves, and determining the suite of situations in which marine reserves work best both within and outside of the broader management arena.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors