A comparison of sampling methods for seawater microplastics and a first report of the microplastic litter in coastal waters of Ascension and Falkland Islands
Green, D.S.; Kregting, L.; Boots, B.; Blockley, D.J.; Brickle, P.; da Costa, M.; Crowley, Q.G. (2018). A comparison of sampling methods for seawater microplastics and a first report of the microplastic litter in coastal waters of Ascension and Falkland Islands. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 137: 695-701. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.004
In: Marine Pollution Bulletin. Macmillan: London. ISSN 0025-326X; e-ISSN 1879-3363, more
|  |
| Author keywords |
Grab samples; Nets; Anthropogenic litter; Remote; Atlantic Ocean; Microfibres |
| Authors | | Top |
- Green, D.S.
- Kregting, L.
- Boots, B.
- Blockley, D.J.
|
- Brickle, P.
- da Costa, M.
- Crowley, Q.G.
|
|
| Abstract |
To date there is no gold standard for sampling microplastics. Zooplankton sampling methods, such as plankton and Neuston nets, are commonly used to estimate the concentrations of microplastics in seawater, but their ability to detect microplastics is limited by their mesh size. We compared different net-based sampling methods with different mesh sizes including bongo nets (>500 μm), manta nets (>300 μm) and plankton nets (>200 μm and >400 μm) to 1 litre bottle grabbed, filtered (0.45 μm) samples. Concentrations of microplastics estimated using net-based methods were ~3 orders of magnitude less than those estimated by 1 litre grab samples. Some parts of the world with low human populations, such as Ascension Island and the Falkland Islands, lack baseline data on microplastics. Using the bottle grab sampling method we found that microplastic litter was present at these remote locations and was comparable to levels of contamination in more populated coastal regions, such as the United Kingdom. |
|
