Skip to main content

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Production of chemicals and utilities in-house improves the environmental sustainability of phytoplankton-based biorefinery
Kiehbadroudinezhad, M.; Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Karimi, K.; Madadi, M.; Chisti, Y.; Peng, W.X.; Liu, D.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M. (2023). Production of chemicals and utilities in-house improves the environmental sustainability of phytoplankton-based biorefinery. Sci. Total Environ. 899: 165751. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165751
In: Science of the Total Environment. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 0048-9697; e-ISSN 1879-1026, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Arthrospira Sitzenberger ex Gomont, 1892 [WoRMS]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Phytoplankton biorefinery; Algal biofuels; Environmental impact; Life cycle analysis; Cumulative exergy demand; Sustainability

Authors  Top 
  • Kiehbadroudinezhad, M.
  • Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.
  • Karimi, K., more
  • Madadi, M.
  • Chisti, Y.
  • Peng, W.X.
  • Liu, D.
  • Tabatabaei, M.
  • Aghbashlo, M.

Abstract
    Life cycle assessment was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of phytoplanktonic biofuels as possible sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. Three scenarios were examined for converting planktonic biomass into higher-value commodities and energy streams using the alga Scenedesmus sp. and the cyanobacterium Arthrospira sp. as the species of interest. The first scenario (Sc-1) involved the production of biodiesel and glycerol from the planktonic biomass. In the second scenario (Sc-2), biodiesel and glycerol were generated from the planktonic biomass, and biogas was produced from the residual biomass. The process also involved using a catalyst derived from snail shells for biodiesel production. The third scenario (Sc-3) was similar to Sc-2 but converted CO2 from the biogas upgrading to methanol, which was then used in synthesizing biodiesel. The results indicated that Sc-2 and Sc-3 had a reduced potential (up to 60 % less) for damaging human health compared to Sc-1. Sc-2 and Sc-3 had up to 61 % less environmental impact than Sc-1. Sc-2 and Sc-3 reduced the total cumulative exergy demand by up to 44 % compared to Sc-1. In conclusion, producing chemicals and utilities within the biorefinery could significantly improve environmental sustainability, reduce waste, and diversify revenue streams.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors