Skip to main content

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Towards smart water monitoring: IoT-driven LSTM modelling for multi-step-ahead forecasting of river salinity dynamics
Karahan, S.M.; Vandenbruwaene, W.; Alferes Castano, J.A.; Van Bauwel, F.; Van Loo, M.; Verwaeren, J. (2025). Towards smart water monitoring: IoT-driven LSTM modelling for multi-step-ahead forecasting of river salinity dynamics. J. Environ. Manage. 394: 127437. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127437
In: Journal of Environmental Management. Academic Press: London; New York. ISSN 0301-4797; e-ISSN 1095-8630, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Salinization;Multi-step-ahead forecasting strategies;Electrical conductivity prediction;Long-short-term memory;Time-series forecasting;Hydrologic hyperparameter tuning;prediction

Authors  Top 
  • Karahan, S.M.
  • Vandenbruwaene, W., more
  • Alferes Castano, J.A.
  • Van Bauwel, F.
  • Van Loo, M.
  • Verwaeren, J.

Abstract
    Effective water resource management increasingly depends on accurate forecasting of water quality parameters, particularly in dynamic river systems affected by saltwater intrusion. Electrical conductivity (EC), a key indicator of salinity, exhibits significant temporal and spatial variability, necessitating robust predictive models. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five multi-step-ahead forecasting strategies (Direct, Recursive, DirREC, MIMO, and DirMO) using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) modelling network applied to highfrequency IoT-based sensor data collected from a river system in a coastal region prone to seasonal salinity fluctuations. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of multi-step-ahead forecasting strategies across short-term (4-h), mid-term (24-h), and long-term (48-h) horizons, supported by extensive hyperparameter tuning incorporating temporal and spatial features. The LSTM model's performance was also compared against state-ofthe-art models, including Informer, DLinear, and PatchTST. Forecasting performance was assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Percent Bias (PBIAS), and Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE). Results show that Direct, MIMO, and DirMO strategies consistently outperformed others across six sensor locations. Across all horizons, Direct achieved SMAPE values ranging from 1.3 % to 9.1 %, MIMO from 5.3 % to 25.2 %, and DirMO from 5.0 % to 22.6 %, with upstream locations showing slightly better performance due to more stable EC dynamics. In contrast, the Recursive and DirREC strategies exhibited error accumulation, particularly in long-term forecasts. These findings highlight the potential of forecasting techniques to reliably describe salinity dynamics but also underscore the importance of selecting appropriate forecasting strategies based on the required accuracy and computational efficiency.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors