Predicting multi-species foraging hotspots for marine turtles in the Gulf of Mexico
Fujisaki, I.; Hart, K.M.; Bucklin, D.; Iverson, A.R.; Rubio, C.; Lamont, M.M.; Gonzales Diaz Miron, R.J.; Burchfield, P.M.; Peña, J.; Shaver, D.J. (2020). Predicting multi-species foraging hotspots for marine turtles in the Gulf of Mexico. Endang. Species Res. 43: 253-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esr01059
In: Endangered Species Research. Inter-Research: Oldendorf/Luhe. ISSN 1613-4796; e-ISSN 1613-4796, more
|   |
| Keywords |
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758) [WoRMS]; Lepidochelys kempii Garman, 1880 [WoRMS]
Marine/Coastal |
| Author keywords |
Ensemble ecological niche model · Foraging · Gulf of Mexico · Habitat · Kemp’s ridley · Loggerhead · Species distribution model |
| Authors | | Top |
- Fujisaki, I.
- Hart, K.M.
- Bucklin, D.
- Iverson, A.R.
|
- Rubio, C.
- Lamont, M.M.
- Gonzales Diaz Miron, R.J.
|
- Burchfield, P.M.
- Peña, J.
- Shaver, D.J.
|
| Abstract |
Quantifying the distribution of animals and identifying underlying characteristics that define suitable habitat are essential for effective conservation of free-ranging species. Prioritizing areas for conservation is important in managing a geographic extent that has a high level of disturbance and limited conservation resources. We examined the potential use of a species distribution model ensemble for multi-species conservation in marine habitats. Using satellite telemetry locations during foraging as input data, and ensemble ecological niche models, we predicted foraging areas for 2 nesting marine turtle species within the Gulf of Mexico (GoM): Kemp’s ridley Lepidochelys kempii (n = 63) and loggerhead Caretta caretta (n = 63). We considered 7 geophysical, biological, and climatic variables and compared contributing factors for each species’ foraging habitat selection. For both species, predicted suitable foraging habitats encompassed large areas along the GoM coast, but only intersected with each other in relatively small areas. Highly parameterized models resulted in overall greater fits, suggesting that multiple factors influence habitat selection by these species. Model validation results were mixed: cross-validation resulted in high prediction accuracy for both species, but an evaluation against independent data resulted in a low omission rate (5%) for Kemp’s ridleys and a high omission rate (72%) for loggerheads. The relatively small intersection of model-predicted foraging areas for these 2 species within the study area may indicate possible niche differentiations. The high omission rate for loggerheads indicates our samples likely underrepresent the population and illustrates the challenges in predicting suitable foraging extents for species that make dynamic movements and have greater individual variability. |
|
