Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [202877]
Impact of different functional crab groups on propagule recruitment and mangrove forest structure
Van Nedervelde, F.; Berger, U.; Cannicci, S.; Koedam, N.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2011). Impact of different functional crab groups on propagule recruitment and mangrove forest structure, in: Mees, J. et al. (Ed.) VLIZ Young Marine Scientists' Day, Brugge, Belgium 25 February 2011: book of abstracts. VLIZ Special Publication, 48: pp. 95
In: Mees, J.; Seys, J. (Ed.) (2011). VLIZ Young Marine Scientists' Day, Brugge, Belgium 25 February 2011: book of abstracts. VLIZ Special Publication, 48. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ): Oostende. xiv, 143 pp., more
In: VLIZ Special Publication. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ): Oostende. ISSN 1377-0950, more

Available in  Authors 
Document type: Summary

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Van Nedervelde, F., more
  • Berger, U.
  • Cannicci, S.
  • Koedam, N., more
  • Dahdouh-Guebas, F., more

Abstract
    The structure of the mangrove ecosystems is affected by various abiotic factors (temperature, salinity, nutrient availability, tidal range, topography, etc.) and biotic factors (intra and inter-specific competition, fauna, anthropogenic pressure etc.) (Lee, 1999b). Faunal impact is largely due to the crab activities (Cannicci et al., 2008). Some authors refer to ‘crabs’ as mangrove ecosystem keystone species (Smith III et al., 1991; Schories et al., 2003). They contribute actively to the forest structure through two activities: the activity of ‘engineering’ (Bartolini et al., 2010) and herbivory behaviour (Schories et al., 2003). Burrows and galleries in hypoxic or anoxic soils allow a better soil oxygenation and increase the bioavailability of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus (Smith III et al., 1991). In addition, some families of herbivorous crabs are known to be a threat to natural and artificial mangrove regeneration (Dahdouh-Guebas et al., 1998) and a regulator of competition in high stand density areas (Bosire et al., 2005), both through consumption of mangrove propagules and juveniles. We focus this ongoing study on the interaction between herbivorous crabs (Sesarmidae), detritivorous crabs (Ocypodidae) and mangrove propagule settings and growth abilities in Gazi Bay, Kenya. Two hypotheses are central: herbivorous crabs influence the structure of mangrove forests by selecting and consuming propagules. Scavengers and herbivorous crabs lead to biogeochemical changes by the construction of burrows and the recycling of organic soil matter. These biogeochemical changes will profoundly influence the structure and the health status of the mangrove forests. We found that herbivorious crabs are not homogeneously distributed and that their distribution is correlated with vegetation structure. Although propagules pulled into burrows are considered predated and lost, we observed that part of these buried propagules did germinate after two days under Avicennia marina cover and after 6 days under Ceriops tagal cover. We found that one propagule out of five on average germinated despite its being below-ground. This prompts us with the question whether or not predation can also be a positive regulator of mangrove regeneration, rather than a negative.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors