Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [231044]
Use of passive sampling devices for monitoring and compliance checking of POP concentrations in water
Lohmann, R.; Booij, K.; Smedes, F.; Vrana, B. (2012). Use of passive sampling devices for monitoring and compliance checking of POP concentrations in water. Environm. Sc. & Poll. Res. 19(6): 1885-1895
In: Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Springer: Heidelberg; Berlin. ISSN 0944-1344; e-ISSN 1614-7499, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 
    NIOZ: NIOZ files 257203

Author keywords
    Persistent organic pollutants; Passive sampler; Water; Monitoring;Compliance; Quality control; Sampler-water partition coefficient;Sampling rate

Authors  Top 
  • Lohmann, R.
  • Booij, K., more
  • Smedes, F., more
  • Vrana, B.

Abstract
    The state of the art of passive water sampling of (nonpolar) organic contaminants is presented. Its suitability for regulatory monitoring is discussed, with an emphasis on the information yielded by passive sampling devices (PSDs), their relevance and associated uncertainties. Almost all persistent organic pollutants (POPs) targeted by the Stockholm Convention are nonpolar or weakly polar, hydrophobic substances, making them ideal targets for sampling in water using PSDs. Widely used nonpolar PSDs include semi-permeable membrane devices, low-density polyethylene and silicone rubber.
    The inter-laboratory variation of equilibrium partition constants between PSD and water is mostly 0.2-0.5 log units, depending on the exact matrix used. The sampling rate of PSDs is best determined by using performance reference compounds during field deployment. The major advantage of PSDs over alternative matrices applicable in trend monitoring (e.g. sediments or biota) is that the various sources of variance including analytical variance and natural environmental variance can be much better controlled, which in turn results in a reduction of the number of analysed samples required to obtain results with comparable statistical power.
    Compliance checking with regulatory limits and analysis of temporal and spatial contaminant trends are two possible fields of application. In contrast to the established use of nonpolar PSDs, polar samplers are insufficiently understood, but research is in progress to develop PSDs for the quantitative assessment of polar waterborne contaminants. In summary, PSD-based monitoring is a mature technique for the measurement of aqueous concentrations of apolar POPs, with a well-defined accuracy and precision.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors