Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [313886]
Plastic ingestion by marine fish in the wild
Markic, A.; Gaertner, J.-C.; Gaertner-Mazouni, N.; Koelmans, A. (2020). Plastic ingestion by marine fish in the wild. Crit. rev. environ. sci. technol. 50(7): 657-697. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1631990
In: Critical reviews in environmental science and technology. CRC Press: Boca Raton Fla.. ISSN 1064-3389; e-ISSN 1547-6537, more
Peer reviewed article  

Keywords
    Contamination
    Food > Human food > Seafood
    Methodology
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    gut content analysis; marine debris; marine plastic pollution; microplastics; sample size

Authors  Top 
  • Markic, A.
  • Gaertner, J.-C.
  • Gaertner-Mazouni, N.
  • Koelmans, A., more

Abstract
    Marine plastic pollution has become a prominent environmental issue in the recent years. Plastic ingestion is of special concern, as its magnitude and consequences for marine organisms and potentially humans are still largely unknown. We reviewed 93 papers on plastic ingestion by wild marine fish published since 1972. Plastic ingestion was detected in 323 (65%) of 494 examined fish species, and in 262 (67%) of 391 examined commercial fish species. These proportions are likely greater, as a detailed analysis of the sampling effort and analytical methods used in the reviewed studies suggests an underestimation of plastic ingestion in some assessments. A significant positive relationship (R = + 0.845, p = 0.004) was found between the sample size up to N = 10 and the detection of plastic ingestion. We also found significant differences in detection and frequency of occurrence (FO, %) of plastic ingestion among the three main types of analytical methods: naked-eye, microscopic analysis and chemical digestion. The chemical digestion method, which is also the most robust laboratory method, had the greatest detection (86%) and the highest FO (37.6 ± 0.6%). To avoid the underestimation of plastic ingestion in future work, we provided recommendations for sample sizes and laboratory analysis.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors