Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [322725]
Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: an assessment from local stakeholders' view point
Martínez-Espinosa, C.; Wolfs, P.; Vande Velde, K.; Satyanarayana, B.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Hugé, J. (2020). Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: an assessment from local stakeholders' view point. Forest Ecol. Manag. 458: 117741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117741
In: Forest Ecology and Management. Elsevier/Elsevier Science: Amsterdam; Lausanne; New York; Oxford; Shannon; Tokyo. ISSN 0378-1127; e-ISSN 1872-7042, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Mangrove management; Local-population perception; Stakeholderinvolvement; Forest management; Socio-ecological system; Ecosystemservices

Authors  Top 
  • Martínez-Espinosa, C., more
  • Wolfs, P., more
  • Vande Velde, K., more
  • Satyanarayana, B., more
  • Dahdouh-Guebas, F., more
  • Hugé, J., more

Abstract

    Effective management of a socio-ecological system (SES) requires a good understanding of: (i) ecosystem functionality, (ii) interactions between social and ecological units, and (iii) stakeholder perceptions and activities. Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR) covering 40,200 ha in Peninsular Malaysia is under silvicultural management (with a 30-year forest rotation cycle) for charcoal and timber production since 1902.

    The aim of this study is to assess the perceptions of (select) local stakeholders on the ongoing mangrove management of MMFR. Earlier, Huge et al. (2016), using Q methodology, identified three main shared perceptions, called discourses: (1) Optimization- ‘keep up the good work, but keep improving’, (2) Change for the better- ‘ecotourism & participatory management for sustainability’, and (3) Continuity – ‘business as usual is the way to go’. The current study is a follow-up to Huge et al. (2016) and reports on a survey which assessed the degree of support of the local stakeholders towards those three management discourses. The core statements of each discourse were presented as questions and then ranked by the participants.

    Based on the findings of the survey, the local stakeholders were clustered into three main working categories: (i) charcoal and timber workers, (ii) fishermen and (iii) service providers. The interviews held with 114 stakeholders indicated that discourse (2) ‘change for the better’ is the most popular (supported by 72% of the participants) regardless of the stakeholders’ working category. This discourse voices the involvement of local people in decision making, adopts participatory management, and encourages diverse mangrove-based economic activities beyond mere charcoal and timber production.

    Single-use management (focusing only on maximising charcoal and timber yields) was perceived as not equitably benefiting all local stakeholders.

    The insights of this study can guide the managers of Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve to improve the sustainability and the local support base for the existing mangrove management regime, e.g. by promoting diverse livelihood options for the local stakeholders.


All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors