| one publication added to basket [329433] | The iFlow inspired TELEMAC-3D model: sub report 1. Comparing ETM dynamics with the iFlow model
Bi, Q.; Kaptein, S.J.; Schramkowski, G.; Smolders, S.; Mostaert, F. (2020). The iFlow inspired TELEMAC-3D model: sub report 1. Comparing ETM dynamics with the iFlow model. Version 3.0. FHR reports, 19_025_1. Flanders Hydraulics Research: Antwerp. VII, 39 + 9 p. app. pp. Part of: FHR reports. Flanders Hydraulics Research: Antwerp, more |
| Available in | Authors | | Document type: Project report
|
| Keywords | Hydraulics and sediment > Hydrodynamics > Current velocities and patterns
Hydraulics and sediment > Hydrodynamics > Tides
Hydraulics and sediment > Hydrodynamics > Water levels
Hydraulics and sediment > Morphology > Sediment balance
Hydraulics and sediment > Sediment > Cohesive sediment
Numerical modelling
| | Author keywords | |
| Abstract | This report is the first part of the comparison study of the two different modelling approaches, idealised modelling using iFlow, and idealised modelling using TELEMAC-3D. The TELEMAC computational domain used in this study is inspired by the iFlow model of the Scheldt estuary from Brouwer et al., 2018. In the iFlow study, the model is used for studying the time evolution of estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) in the Scheldt. Both computational efficiency and the well-presented physical processes in this iFlow model makes capturing ETM zones possible. However, reproducing ETM dynamics still faces challenges in the TELEMAC-3D or other large-scale complex models. This study tries to find out the necessary model set-ups required for capturing an ETM in a TELEMAC-3D model, with the inspirations from the iFlow model. |
|
