Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [334916]
“Urchin pinning”: behavioural observations reveal how hungry urchins actively prey upon their sea star predators
Clements, J.C.; Dupont, S.; Jutfelt, F. (2021). “Urchin pinning”: behavioural observations reveal how hungry urchins actively prey upon their sea star predators. Ethology 127(6): 484-489. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.13147
In: Ethology. Wiley-Blackwell: Berlin. ISSN 0179-1613; e-ISSN 1439-0310, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    ASSEMBLEPlus Transnational Access
    Exploitable Scientific Result
    Scientific Publication
    Echinodermata [WoRMS]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    benthic ecology; Echinodermata; feeding ecology; predator-prey reversal

Authors  Top 
  • Clements, J.C.
  • Dupont, S., more
  • Jutfelt, F.

Abstract
    Green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) are dominant components of benthic ecosystems that form aggregations and can transform entire kelp forests into barren systems. While these urchins are known to unwittingly consume practically anything in their path while grazing, detailed descriptions of active predatory behaviour on known predators (i.e., predator–prey reversal) are undocumented. Here, we use laboratory observations to describe the behavioural tactics used by starved S. droebachiesis to actively attack and consume sea stars, Crossaster papposus—a known predator of S. droebachiensis. We observed urchins preying on three separate sea stars, with one being substantially consumed by urchins within 24 hr. Urchins exhibited a direct mode of attack on sea stars by individually mounting and consuming the tips of the arms. Interestingly, we did not observe any conflict between individual urchins for attacking the sea star despite there being ≈80 starving urchins in the tank (and only 10–12 arms on the sea stars). Some sea stars did not attempt to escape urchin predation at all, while others attempted to escape by fleeing and lifting arms on top of the urchins. Given that sensory perception in sea stars is largely derived from the arm tips, we suggest that urchins directly attack and consume many sea star arm tips in an attempt to “pin” sea stars before consuming them. As such, we term this predatory behaviour “urchin pinning.” These observations ultimately provide the first detailed behavioural documentation of how urchins actively prey on a known predator and provide a basis for a wealth of future research.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors