| one publication added to basket [338191] | CFD simulation of a vertical axis wind turbine operating at a moderate tip speed ratio: guidelines for minimum domain size and azimuthal increment
Rezaeiha, A.; Kalkman, I.; Blocken, B. (2017). CFD simulation of a vertical axis wind turbine operating at a moderate tip speed ratio: guidelines for minimum domain size and azimuthal increment. Renew. Energy 107: 373-385. https://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.006 In: Renewable Energy. Elsevier: Oxford. ISSN 0960-1481; e-ISSN 1879-0682, more |   |
| Author keywords | Vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT); CFD; Guideline; Domain size; Azimuthal increment; Number of revolutions |
| Authors | | Top | - Rezaeiha, A., more
- Kalkman, I.
- Blocken, B., more
| | |
| Abstract | Accurate prediction of the performance of a vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation requires a domain size that is large enough to minimize the effects of blockage and uncertainties in the boundary conditions on the results. It also requires the employment of a sufficiently fine azimuthal increment (dθ) combined with a grid size at which essential flow characteristics can be accurately resolved. The current study systematically investigates the effect of the domain size and azimuthal increment on the performance of a 2-bladed VAWT operating at a moderate tip speed ratio of 4.5 using 2-dimensional and 2.5-dimensional simulations with the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS). The grid dependence of the results is studied using three systematically refined grids. The turbine has a low solidity of 0.12 and a swept area of 1 m2. Refining dθ from 10.0° to 0.5° results in a significant (≈43%) increase in the predicted power coefficient (CP) while the effect is negligible (≈0.25%) with further refinement from 0.5° to 0.05° at the given λ. Furthermore, a distance from the turbine center to the domain inlet and outlet of 10D (D: diameter of turbine) each, a domain width of 20D and a diameter of the rotating core of 1.5D are found to be safe choices to minimize the effects of blockage and uncertainty in the boundary conditions on the results. |
|
