Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [351771]
How new science should affect the application of protection measures for UK estuarine shorebirds
Goss-Custard, J.D.; Stillman, R.A. (2020). How new science should affect the application of protection measures for UK estuarine shorebirds, in: Humphreys, J. et al. Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. pp. 525-542. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102698-4.00027-7
In: Humphreys, J.; Clark, R.W.E. (Ed.) (2020). Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISBN 978-0-08-102698-4. xxi, 792 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2017-0-02525-9, more

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Aves [WoRMS]; Haematopus ostralegus Linnaeus, 1758 [WoRMS]
    ANE, British Isles, England, Devon, Exe Estuary [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal; Brackish water
Author keywords
    Shorebirds; Special protection areas; Disturbance; Habitat loss; Habituation; Mitigation; Eurasian oystercatcher; Individual based model

Authors  Top 
  • Goss-Custard, J.D.
  • Stillman, R.A.

Abstract
    Using data primarily from the Exe estuary in Devon, England, we argue that the current regulations for UK Special Protection Areas fail to take into account a number of important realities about the attributes of estuaries that influence the ability of a site to support the number of shorebirds for which the site was designated. We argue that the effect of these omissions, and the ways in which the regulations have been implemented, has been to exaggerate the impact on the birds that many proposals, if carried out, would actually have. This leads to skepticism, even cynicism, in the minds of an unconvinced public that has been affected by decisions based on arguments they see as inconsistent with experience and common sense. The main omissions in the regulations are: (i) to consider the attributes of habitat quality and extent, disturbance and predation individually rather than considering their combined, net contribution to ensuring the favourable status of the site; (ii) to ignore completely the attribute of the time available for foraging, and (iii) to not allow for birds to habituate to the presence of people.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors