Valorization of South Korean marine biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar synthesis and investigation of adsorption capacity
Kooy, E. (2024). Valorization of South Korean marine biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar synthesis and investigation of adsorption capacity. MSc Thesis. Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering: Gent. 89 pp. | |
Available in | Author | | Document type: Dissertation
|
Keywords | Environments > Aquatic environment > Marine environment Fish products Seafood products Waste management Korea, Rep. Marine/Coastal | Author keywords | marine biowaste, biorefinery |
Abstract | This thesis addresses the pressing issue of marine biowaste generated from the consumption of fish and seafood, which poses significant environmental and socioeconomic challenges. With global population growth, the generation of such waste is expected to rise, necessitating responsible management strategies. Therefore, the valorisation potential through hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was investigated. HTC on eight fish and crustacean species was performed at three different temperatures (T = 200, 220, 240°C, t = 5h, w/b = 7). The produced hydrochars (HC) were characterized through point zero charge (PZC), elemental and proximate analysis and FTIR. Their adsorption characteristics were evaluated using kinetic and adsorption models and using one-point adsorption experiments with an anionic (methyl orange, MO) and cationic (methylene blue, MB) dye. In addition, the influence of ionic strength on the adsorption performance was evaluated. Crustacean-HC showed higher yields (37-69%) than fish-HC (15- 22%). Furthermore, crustacean-HC showed higher PZC than fish-HC (7.93 versus 6.49). The adsorption capacity of the HCs (MB: 2.7-10.8 mg/g and MO: 5.9-9.2 mg/g) showed a higher adsorption of MO for the crustacean-HCs. Difference in ionic strength in adsorption experiments was concluded to not yield significantly different adsorption results. The difference in yields, PZC and adsorption results were explained by the differences in feedstock composition, further emphasizing the importance of elucidating the inherent feedstock characteristics for waste utilization |
|