Improving sea-level projections on the Northwestern European shelf using dynamical downscaling
Hermans, T.H.J.; Tinker, J.; Palmer, M.D.; Katsman, C.A.; Vermeersen, B.L.A.; Slangen, A.B.A. (2020). Improving sea-level projections on the Northwestern European shelf using dynamical downscaling. Clim. Dyn. 54: 1987–2011. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05104-5Additional data: In: Climate Dynamics. Springer: Berlin; Heidelberg. ISSN 0930-7575; e-ISSN 1432-0894, more |   |
| Author keywords | Regional sea level; Sea-level variability; Sea-level projections; Global climate models; Dynamical downscaling; Northwestern European shelf |
| Authors | | Top | - Hermans, T.H.J., more
- Tinker, J.
- Palmer, M.D.
| - Katsman, C.A.
- Vermeersen, B.L.A., more
- Slangen, A.B.A., more
| |
| Abstract | Changes in ocean properties and circulation lead to a spatially non-uniform pattern of ocean dynamic sea-level change (DSLC). The projections of ocean dynamic sea level presented in the IPCC AR5 were constructed with global climate models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5). Since CMIP5 GCMs have a relatively coarse resolution and exclude tides and surges it is unclear whether they are suitable for providing DSLC projections in shallow coastal regions such as the Northwestern European Shelf (NWES). One approach to addressing these shortcomings is dynamical downscaling – i.e. using a high-resolution regional model forced with output from GCMs. Here we use the regional shelf seas model AMM7 to show that, depending on the driving CMIP5 GCM, dynamical downscaling can have a large impact on DSLC simulations in the NWES region. For a business-as-usual greenhouse gas concentration scenario, we find that downscaled simulations of twenty-first century DSLC can be up to 15.5 cm smaller than DSLC in the GCM simulations along the North Sea coastline owing to unresolved processes in the GCM. Furthermore, dynamical downscaling affects the simulated time of emergence of sea-level change (SLC) above sea-level variability, and can result in differences in the projected change of the amplitude of the seasonal cycle of sea level of over 0.3 mm/yr. We find that the difference between GCM and downscaled results is of similar magnitude to the uncertainty of CMIP5 ensembles used for previous DSLC projections. Our results support a role for dynamical downscaling in future regional sea-level projections to aid coastal decision makers. |
|
