Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Temporal trends of mercury in Arctic biota: 10 more years of progress in Arctic monitoring
Morris, A.D.; Wilson, S.J.; Fryer, R.J.; Thomas, P.J.; Hudelson, K.; Andreasen, B.; Blévin, P.; Bustamante, P.; Chastel, O.; Christensen, G.; Dietz, R.; Evans, M.; Evenset, A.; Ferguson, S.H.; Fort, J.; Gamberg, M.; Grémillet, D.; Houde, M.; Letcher, R.J.; Loseto, L.; Muir, D.; Pinzone, M.; Poste, A.; Routti, H.; Sonne, C.; Stern, G.; Riget, F.F. (2022). Temporal trends of mercury in Arctic biota: 10 more years of progress in Arctic monitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 839: 155803. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155803
In: Science of the Total Environment. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 0048-9697; e-ISSN 1879-1026, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Mercury; Arctic; Biota; Temporal trends; Environmental monitoring; Statistical assessment

Authors  Top 
  • Morris, A.D.
  • Wilson, S.J.
  • Fryer, R.J.
  • Thomas, P.J.
  • Hudelson, K.
  • Andreasen, B.
  • Blévin, P.
  • Bustamante, P.
  • Chastel, O.
  • Christensen, G.
  • Dietz, R., more
  • Evans, M.
  • Evenset, A.
  • Ferguson, S.H.
  • Fort, J.
  • Gamberg, M.
  • Grémillet, D.
  • Houde, M.
  • Letcher, R.J.
  • Loseto, L.
  • Muir, D.
  • Pinzone, M., more
  • Poste, A.
  • Routti, H.
  • Sonne, C.
  • Stern, G.
  • Riget, F.F., more

Abstract
    Temporal trend analysis of (total) mercury (THg) concentrations in Arctic biota were assessed as part of the 2021 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) Mercury Assessment. A mixed model including an evaluation of non-linear trends was applied to 110 time series of THg concentrations from Arctic and Subarctic biota. Temporal trends were calculated for full time series (6–46 years) and evaluated with a particular focus on recent trends over the last 20 years. Three policy-relevant questions were addressed: (1) What time series for THg concentrations in Arctic biota are currently available? (2) Are THg concentrations changing over time in biota from the Arctic? (3) Are there spatial patterns in THg trends in biota from the Arctic? Few geographical patterns of recent trends in THg concentrations were observed; however, those in marine mammals tended to be increasing at more easterly longitudes, and those of seabirds tended to be increasing in the Northeast Atlantic; these should be interpreted with caution as geographic coverage remains variable. Trends of THg in freshwater fish were equally increasing and decreasing or non-significant while those in marine fish and mussels were non-significant or increasing. The statistical power to detect trends was greatly improved compared to the 2011 AMAP Mercury Assessment; 70% of the time series could detect a 5% annual change at the 5% significance level with power ≥ 80%, while in 2011 only 19% met these criteria. Extending existing time series, and availability of new, powerful time series contributed to these improvements, highlighting the need for annual monitoring, particularly given the spatial and temporal information needed to support initiatives such as the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Collecting the same species/tissues across different locations is recommended. Extended time series from Alaska and new data from Russia are also needed to better establish circumarctic patterns of temporal trends.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors