Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

A review of support tools to assess multi-sector interactions in the emerging offshore Blue Economy
Turschwell, M.P.; Hayes, M.A.; Lacharité, M.; Abundo, M.; Adams, J.; Blanchard, J.; Brain, E.; Buelow, C.A.; Bulman, C.; Condie, S.A.; Connolly, R.M.; Dutton, I.; Fulton, E.A.; Gallagher, S.; Maynard, D.; Pethybridge, H.; Plagányi, E.; Porobic, J.; Taelman, S.E.; Trebilco, R.; Woods, G.; Brown, C.J. (2022). A review of support tools to assess multi-sector interactions in the emerging offshore Blue Economy. Environ. Sci. Policy 133: 203-214. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.016
In: Environmental Science & Policy. Elsevier: Exeter. ISSN 1462-9011; e-ISSN 1873-6416, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Aquaculture; Offshore; Renewable energy; Multi-use platform; Planning; Sustainability

Authors  Top 
  • Turschwell, M.P.
  • Hayes, M.A.
  • Lacharité, M.
  • Abundo, M.
  • Adams, J.
  • Blanchard, J.
  • Brain, E.
  • Buelow, C.A.
  • Bulman, C.
  • Condie, S.A.
  • Connolly, R.M.
  • Dutton, I.
  • Fulton, E.A.
  • Gallagher, S.
  • Maynard, D.
  • Pethybridge, H.
  • Plagányi, E.
  • Porobic, J.
  • Taelman, S.E., more
  • Trebilco, R.
  • Woods, G.
  • Brown, C.J.

Abstract
    Multiple ocean sectors compete for space and resources, creating conflicts but also opportunities to plan for synergistic outcomes that benefit multiple sectors. Planning and management are increasingly informed by qualitative and quantitative methods for assessing multi-sector interactions to identify trade-offs and synergies among sectors and with the environment, but there is a need to critically review the alignment of these tools with the requirements of Blue Economy stakeholders. Through a systematic literature review, an operational maturity analysis, and a survey of Blue Economy stakeholders, we found that the most well-developed tools for assessing interactions between multiple Blue Economy industries, and with the environment, are spatial prioritization tools, such as Marxan and multi-criteria decision support tools; and spatial static tools, such as cumulative effect mapping. More complex process/dynamic tools such as ecosystem and oceanographic models are well developed for single sectors, particularly water quality assessments and commercial fisheries, but have been less commonly applied in multi-sector contexts. Our review and stakeholder survey highlighted that assessing the environmental and operational suitability of sites for Blue Economy infrastructure in conjunction with operational impacts, trade-offs and decommissioning considerations requires: 1) a toolbox of approaches that covers a range of spatial, temporal and ecological scales; 2) tools that capture interactions and feedbacks among sectors, and with the environment, without being unnecessarily complicated (i.e., tractable to use and allow for effective communication of findings); and 3) continued synthesis of approaches and tools used across sectors such as commercial fishing, aquaculture, offshore renewable energy, and offshore engineering.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors