Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

What kind of fish stock predictions do we need and what kinds of information will help us to make better predictions?
Brander, K.M. (2003). What kind of fish stock predictions do we need and what kinds of information will help us to make better predictions? Sci. Mar. (Barc.) 67(S1): 21-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2003.67s121
In: Scientia Marina (Barcelona). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Institut de Ciènces del Mar: Barcelona. ISSN 0214-8358; e-ISSN 1886-8134, more
Also appears in:
Ulltang, Ø.; Blom, G. (2003). Fish stock assessments and predictions: integrating relevant knowledge. SAP Symposium held in Bergen, Norway 4-6 December 2000. Scientia Marina (Barcelona), 67(S1). Institut de Ciències de Mar: Barcelona. 374 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2003.67s1, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Author 

Keywords
    Management > Resource management > Fishery management
    Population dynamics
    Prediction
    Stock assessment
    Stocks
    AE, North Atlantic [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal

Author  Top 
  • Brander, K.M.

Abstract
    Fish stock predictions are used to guide fisheries management, but stocks continue to be over-exploited. "Traditional" single-species age-structured stock assessment models, which became an operational component of fisheries management in the 1950s, ignore biological and environmental effects. As our knowledge of the marine environment improves and our concern about the state of the marine ecosystem and about global change increases, the scope of our models needs to be widened. We need different kinds of predictions as well as better predictions. Population characteristics (rates of mortality, growth, recruitment) of 61 stocks of 17 species of NE Atlantic fish are reviewed in order to consider the implications for the time-scale and quality of stock predictions. Short life expectancy limits the time horizon for predictability based on the current fishable stock and predictions are therefore more dependent on estimates or assumptions about future rates. Evidence is presented that rates of growth and recruitment are influenced by environmental factors and possibilities for including new information are explored in order to improve predictions.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Author