IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page
Deep reinforcement learning based on tracking control of an autonomous surface vessel in natural waters
Wang, W.; Cao, X.J.; Gonzalez-Garcia, A.; Yin, L.H.; Hagemann, N.; Qiao, Y.Y.; Ratti, C.; Rus, D. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning based on tracking control of an autonomous surface vessel in natural waters, in: Conference proceedings ICRA 2023, 29th May – 2nd June, 2023: International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3109-3115. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160858
In: (2023). Conference proceedings ICRA 2023, 29th May – 2nd June, 2023: International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE: United Kingdom. ISBN 979-8-3503-2366-5; e-ISBN 979-8-3503-2365-8. [diff. pag.] pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023, more
Available in  Authors 
Document type: Conference paper
Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Authors  Top 
  • Wang, W.
  • Cao, X.J.
  • Gonzalez-Garcia, A., more
  • Yin, L.H.
  • Hagemann, N.
  • Qiao, Y.Y.
  • Ratti, C.
  • Rus, D.
Abstract
    Accurate control of autonomous marine robots still poses challenges due to the complex dynamics of the environment. In this paper, we propose a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach to train a controller for autonomous surface vessel (ASV) trajectory tracking and compare its performance with an advanced nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) in real environments. Taking into account environmental disturbances (e.g., wind, waves, and currents), noisy measurements, and non-ideal actuators presented in the physical ASV, several effective reward functions for DRL tracking control policies are carefully designed. The control policies were trained in a simulation environment with diverse tracking trajectories and disturbances. The performance of the DRL controller has been verified and compared with the NMPC in both simulations with model-based environmental disturbances and in natural waters. Simulations show that the DRL controller has 53.33% lower tracking error than that of NMPC. Experimental results further show that, compared to NMPC, the DRL controller has 35.51% lower tracking error, indicating that DRL controllers offer better disturbance rejection in river environments than NMPC.
All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors