Skip to main content

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors
Pytharouli, S.; Chaikalis, S.; Stiros, S.C. (2018). Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors. Measurement 125: 496-508. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.012
In: Measurement. Elsevier SCI Ltd: Oxford. ISSN 0263-2241; e-ISSN 1873-412X, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Authors  Top 
  • Pytharouli, S.
  • Chaikalis, S.
  • Stiros, S.C.

Abstract
    Understanding noise and possible bias in tide-gauge sensors is important for determining the mean sea level, its fluctuations and their climatic, geophysical and engineering implications, but not an easy task. In the past, this problem has been examined through comparison of different sensors in the laboratory, or through correlations of neighbouring sensors. In this study we identified and studied 10 cases of harbours with fully collocated sensors. Transient differences were found between collocated records. Pressure gauges were found significantly more sensitive to noise than radar-type sensors, and with higher chances of long-term transient bias. The amplitude ofthe observed bias is important, of the same order of magnitude with tsunami waves in the open sea and with seismic ground displacements. Only 9% of the sensors analysed were found to satisfy the 1 cm accuracy criterion imposed by the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL).

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors