Skip to main content

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

A comparative study of percid scales (Teleostei: Perciformes)
Coburn, M.M.; Gaglione, J.I. (1992). A comparative study of percid scales (Teleostei: Perciformes). Copeia 1992(4): 986-1001
In: Copeia. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists: New York, N.Y., etc.. ISSN 0045-8511; e-ISSN 1938-5110, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Coburn, M.M.
  • Gaglione, J.I.

Abstract
    A survey of scales of Percina (17 spp.), Etheostoma (39 spp.), Ammocrypta (3 spp.), Crystallaria (1 sp.), Stizostedion (3 spp.), Perca (2 spp.), Gymnocephalus (2 spp.), Zingel (2 spp.), and Romanichthys (1 sp.) showed that percids can be dis- tinguished from moronids, centrarchids, and percichthyids using scale characters. Based on limited outgroup comparisons to these families, scales of Gymnocephalus, Perca, and Stizostedion may represent the plesiomorphic condition for percids. Each has stout spines with basal plates about one-third the length of a mature ctenus. Ctenial bases have transverse processes that are ligamentously joined to those of adjacent rows, but they do not form an interlocking pattern. This feature, a scalloped anterior scale margin, posterior placement of the focus, and a more expansive ctenial field distinguish percids from the other three families. Percina, Etheostoma, Ammocrypta, Crystallaria, Romanichthys, and Zingel are distinguished from other percids by the presence of alae, basal projections of cteni that interlock with those of adjacent rows, and by reduction in secondary ossifications between the proximal radial rows. Alae may be a synapomorphy uniting these genera

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors