Skip to main content

IMIS

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: towards understanding the complementarities
Graetz, F. (2002). Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: towards understanding the complementarities. Management Decision 40(5): 456-462. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740210430434
In: Management Decision. Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley. ISSN 0025-1747; e-ISSN 1758-6070, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Author 

Author keywords

Author  Top 
  • Graetz, F.

Abstract
    In an environment characterised by flux and uncertainty, a capacity for innovative, divergent strategic thinking rather than conservative, convergent strategic planning is seen as central to creating and sustaining competitive advantage. As the case study of Communications Co. illustrates, scenario planning is one tool that many organisations, committed to redesigning their strategic planning processes, are using with some success. However, scenario planning requires both left‐ and right‐brain thinking styles. The elements of left‐brain thinking reflect the planning side of strategy making, while right‐brain thinking mirrors the thinking component of strategy making. The relationship between the factors that enable strategic thinking and the level of “emotional intelligence” of business leaders is also considered. The Communications Co. case findings appear to support the view that while strategic thinking capabilities can be nurtured and diffused through an organisation, it will need business leaders with a high degree of emotional intelligence to lead the way.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Author