Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

An analysis of the cross-shore beach morphodynamics of a sandy and a composite gravel beach
Karunarathna, H.; Horrillo-Caraballo, J.M.; Ranasinghe, R.; Short, A.D.; Reeve, D.E. (2012). An analysis of the cross-shore beach morphodynamics of a sandy and a composite gravel beach. Mar. Geol. 299-302: 33-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2011.12.011
In: Marine Geology. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 0025-3227; e-ISSN 1872-6151, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Analysis > Mathematical analysis > Statistical analysis > Correlation analysis
    Earth sciences > Geology > Geomorphology > Coastal morphology > Beach morphology
    Eigenfunctions
    Orthogonals
    Profiles > Horizontal profiles > Beach profiles
    Sandy beaches
    Sediments > Clastics > Gravel
    Topographic features > Landforms > Coastal landforms > Beaches
    Australia, New South Wales [Marine Regions]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    sand and composite sand-gravel beaches; cross-shore beach profile; beachmorphodynamics; Orthogonal Eigenfunction Analysis; Canonical CorrelationAnalysis

Project Top | Authors 
  • Innovative coastal technologies for safer European coasts in a changing climate, more

Authors  Top 
  • Karunarathna, H.
  • Horrillo-Caraballo, J.M.
  • Ranasinghe, R.
  • Short, A.D.
  • Reeve, D.E.

Abstract
    In this paper, beach profile surveys acquired over more than a decade at a sandy beach (Narrabeen Beach, New South Wales, Australia) and a composite sand–gravel beach (Milford-on-Sea, Christchurch Bay, UK) are analysed to compare and contrast cross-shore morphodynamics of the two beach types. The different behavioural characteristics of the two beach types at decadal, inter-annual and intra-annual time scales are investigated. Comparisons of beach profiles with Dean's equilibrium profile and Vellinga's erosion profile show that the Dean's profile satisfactorily represents the time mean profiles of both beach types. Statistical and Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analyses confirm the generally accepted model that the inter-tidal zone is the most morphodynamically active region on a sandy beach whereas the swash zone is the most dynamic region on a mixed sand–gravel beach. The results also imply that during storms composite sand–gravel beaches may become unstable due to cutback of the upper beach while sandy beaches are more likely to be unstable as a result of beach lowering due to sediment transport from the inter-tidal zone to the sub-tidal zone during storms. EOF results also show that Milford-on-Sea beach is in a state of steady recession while the Narrabeen Beach shows a cyclic erosion–accretion variability. A multivariate technique (Canonical Correlation Analysis, CCA) shows that on the composite beach a strong correlation exists between incident wave steepness and profile response, which could be attributed to the unsaturated surf zone, whereas on the sandy beach any correlation is much less evident.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors