Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Quantifying the density of mangrove crabs: Ocypodidae and Grapsidae
Skov, M.; Vannini, M.; Shunula, J.; Hartnoll, R.G.; Cannicci, S. (2002). Quantifying the density of mangrove crabs: Ocypodidae and Grapsidae. Mar. Biol. (Berl.) 141(4): 725-732. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-002-0867-9
In: Marine Biology: International Journal on Life in Oceans and Coastal Waters. Springer: Heidelberg; Berlin. ISSN 0025-3162; e-ISSN 1432-1793, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Mangroves
    Properties > Physical properties > Density
    Neosarmatium meinerti (De Man, 1887) [WoRMS]; Sesarma guttatum A. Milne-Edwards, 1869 [WoRMS]; Uca (Austruca) annulipes (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) [WoRMS]
    ISW, Kenya, Mida Creek [Marine Regions]; ISW, Mozambique [Marine Regions]; ISW, Tanzania, Zanzibar [Marine Regions]

Authors  Top 
  • Skov, M., more
  • Vannini, M., more
  • Shunula, J.
  • Hartnoll, R.G.
  • Cannicci, S., more

Abstract
    Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of crabs within mangrove ecosystems, but tested methods of enumeration are virtually non-existent. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of quick, non-invasive methods for estimating the population density of three species of mangrove crabs in East Africa: Uca annulipes, Sesarma guttatum and Neosarmatium meinerti. Methods employed depended on the behaviour and habitat of each species. Counts of U. annulipes and N. meinerti individuals that were active on the surface (visual counts) and burrow counts (of U.annulipes) were compared to actual densities. Actual densities were determined by excavation of U.annulipes, and by multiplying counts of N. meinerti burrows by the mean number of crabs per burrow. Visual counts of marked individuals of S. guttatum were compared to known densities of marked crabs. For N. meinerti two visual counting methods were tested: (1) instant counts – crabs were counted every 5 min during 0.5 h and the highest count taken; and (2) continuous counts – all burrows were tagged, and those from which a crab emerged during 0.5 h were totalled. For U.annulipes on Inhaca Island (Mozambique) visual counts underestimated excavated numbers by 27%, whereas burrow counts overestimated numbers by 46%. These values were similar for both sexes, and on both spring and neap tides. Burrow counts and visual counts estimated absolute numbers of U. annulipes with equal consistency. At Mida Creek (Kenya) visual counts underestimated U.annulipes numbers by 37%, again with no differences between spring and neap tides. In Zanzibar 81% of N. meinerti burrows contained a crab. The instant visual count underestimated N. meinerti numbers by 41%, the continuous count, by 12%. Visual counts of S. guttatum in Zanzibar (Tanzania) underestimated crab numbers by 49%.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors