Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach
Leasi, F.; Sevigny, J.L.; Laflamme, E.M.; Artois, T.; Curini-Galletti, M.; de Jesús-Navarrete, A.; Di Domênico, M.; Goetz, F.; Hall, J.A.; Hochberg, R.; Jörger, K.M.; Jondelius, U.; Todaro, M.A.; Wirshing, H.H.; Norenburg, J.L.; Thomas, W.K. (2018). Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach. Communications Biology 1(1): 112. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0119-2
In: Communications Biology. Nature Portfolio: Berlin. e-ISSN 2399-3642, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Leasi, F.
  • Sevigny, J.L.
  • Laflamme, E.M.
  • Artois, T., more
  • Curini-Galletti, M.
  • de Jesús-Navarrete, A.
  • Di Domênico, M.
  • Goetz, F.
  • Hall, J.A.
  • Hochberg, R.
  • Jörger, K.M.
  • Jondelius, U.
  • Todaro, M.A., more
  • Wirshing, H.H.
  • Norenburg, J.L.
  • Thomas, W.K.

Abstract
    Accurate assessments of biodiversity are crucial to advising ecosystem-monitoring programs and understanding ecosystem function. Nevertheless, a standard operating procedure to assess biodiversity accurately and consistently has not been established. This is especially true for meiofauna, a diverse community (>20 phyla) of small benthic invertebrates that have fundamental ecological roles. Recent studies show that metabarcoding is a cost-effective and time-effective method to estimate meiofauna biodiversity, in contrast to morphological-based taxonomy. Here, we compare biodiversity assessments of a diverse meiofaunal community derived by applying multiple taxonomic methods based on comparative morphology, molecular phylogenetic analysis, DNA barcoding of individual specimens, and metabarcoding of environmental DNA. We show that biodiversity estimates are strongly biased across taxonomic methods and phyla. Such biases affect understanding of community structures and ecological interpretations. This study supports the urgency of improving aspects of environmental high-throughput sequencing and the value of taxonomists in correctly understanding biodiversity estimates.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors