Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Habitat-forming species trap microplastics into coastal sediment sinks
de Smit, J.C.; Anton, A.; Martin, C.; Rossbach, S.; Bouma, T.J.; Duarte, C.M. (2021). Habitat-forming species trap microplastics into coastal sediment sinks. Sci. Total Environ. 772: 145520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145520

Additional data:
In: Science of the Total Environment. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 0048-9697; e-ISSN 1879-1026, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Plastic; Coastal ecosystems; Hydrodynamics; Sediment; Benthic structures

Authors  Top 
  • de Smit, J.C., more
  • Anton, A.
  • Martin, C.
  • Rossbach, S.
  • Bouma, T.J., more
  • Duarte, C.M., more

Abstract
    Nearshore biogenic habitats are known to trap sediments, and may therefore also accumulate biofouled, non-buoyant microplastics. Using a current-generating field flume (TiDyFLOW), we experimentally assessed the mechanisms of microplastic trapping of two size classes, 0.5 mm and 2.5 mm particle size, by three contrasting types of biogenic habitats: 1) seagrasses, 2) macroalgae, and 3) scleractinian corals. Results showed that benthic organisms with a complex architecture and rough surface – such as hard corals – trap the highest number of microplastics in their aboveground structure. Sediment was however the major microplastic sink, accumulating 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more microplastics than the benthic structure. Microplastic accumulation in the sediment could be explained by near-bed turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), indicating that this is governed by the same hydrodynamic processes leading to sediment trapping. Thus, the most valuable biogenic habitats in terms of nursery and coastal protection services also have the highest capacity of accumulating microplastics in their sediments. A significantly larger fraction of 0.5 mm particles was trapped in the sediment compared to 2.5 mm particles, because especially the smaller microplastics are entrained into the sediment. Present observations contribute to explaining why especially microplastics smaller than 1 mm are missing in surface waters.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors