Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

A path forward for analysing the impacts of marine protected areas
Hilborn, R.; Kaiser, M.J. (2022). A path forward for analysing the impacts of marine protected areas. Nature (Lond.) 607(7917): E1-E2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04775-1
In: Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science. Nature Publishing Group: London. ISSN 0028-0836; e-ISSN 1476-4687, more
Related to:
Sala, E.; Mayorga, J.; Bradley, D.; Cabral, R.B.; Atwood, T.B.; Auber, A.; Cheung, W.; Costello, C.; Ferretti, F.; Friedlander, A.M.; Gaines, S.D.; Garilao, C.; Goodell, W.; Halpern, B.S.; Hinson, A.; Kaschner, K.; Kesner-Reyes, K.; Leprieur, F.; McGowan, J.; Morgan, L.E.; Mouillot, D.; Palacios-Abrantes, J.; Possingham, H.P.; Rechberger, K.D.; Worm, B.; Lubchenco, J. (2021). Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature (Lond.) 592(7854): 397-402. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Hilborn, R.
  • Kaiser, M.J., more

Abstract
    The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors