The underexposed nature-based solutions: A critical state-of-art review on drought mitigation
Yimer, E.A.; De Trift, L.; Lobkowicz, I.; Villani, L.; Nossent, J. (2024). The underexposed nature-based solutions: A critical state-of-art review on drought mitigation. J. Environ. Manage. 352: 119903. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119903 In: Journal of Environmental Management. Academic Press: London; New York. ISSN 0301-4797; e-ISSN 1095-8630, more |  |
| Keywords | Literature and desktop study
Numerical modelling
Water management > Hydrology > Physically based models
Water management > Risk > Low water strategies
Water management > Water quantity > Water system knowledge
| | Author keywords | |
| Project | Top | Authors | - PhD - Predicting Impact Climate Change on Drought in the Scheldt River Basin, more
|
| Authors | | Top | - Yimer, E.A.
- De Trift, L.
- Lobkowicz, I.
| - Villani, L.
- Nossent, J., more
- Van Griensven, A., more
| |
| Abstract | Droughts are the most expensive climate disasters as they leave long-term and chronic impacts on the ecosystem, agriculture, and human society. The intensity, frequency, and duration of drought events have increased over the years and are expected to worsen in the future on a regional and planetary/global scale. Nature-based solutions (NBS) such as wetland and floodplain restorations, green infrastructures, rainwater harvesting, etc., are highlighted as effective solutions to cope with the future impacts of these events. While the role of NBS in coping with the impacts of other disasters, such as floods, has been extensively studied, there has been a lack of comprehensive review of NBS targeting drought. The following paper provides a unique critical state-of-the-art literature review of individual drought-related NBS around the world, in Europe, and particularly in Belgium, and assesses the critical differences between the NBS applied globally and in Flanders. An extensive literature review was conducted to systematically analyze NBS, listing the type, the location, the status of the implementation, and the possible recommendations proposed to optimize future NBS applications. Finally, a comparison is made between small- and large-scale applications of NBS. By analyzing all these aspects, especially the level of effectiveness and recommendations, insight was gained into the future potential of NBS and possible improvements. The research indicated a lack of scientific publications, especially in Belgium. Hence, grey literature was also included in the literature review. Only four papers included a quantitative assessment regarding the effectiveness of drought on a global level, all stating a positive impact on groundwater recharge. In contrast, at regional and country levels, the performance of NBS was not quantified. The number of large-scale implementations is low, where landscape- or watershed-scale holistic approaches to drought mitigation are still scarce. Some successfully implemented projects are only very local and have a long realization time, two aspects that limit achieving visible impact at a larger scale. Among the many NBS, wetlands are recognized as highly effective in coping with drought but are still degraded or lost despite their significant restoration potential. A common effectiveness evaluation framework shall be followed, which gives policymakers a clear view of the different NBS investment options. Furthermore, a more collaborative approach is recommended globally, including different stakeholder groups, with specific attention to the local communities. To conclude, future research should increase the evidence base and implementation of drought-mitigating NBS.
|
|
