Skip to main content

IMIS

A new integrated search interface will become available in the next phase of marineinfo.org.
For the time being, please use IMIS to search available data

 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Using a common morphometric-based method to sex a migratory bird along its entire flyway despite geographical and temporal variations in body size and sexual size dimorphism
Pagnon, T.; Etchart, L.; Teixeira, M.; Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X.; Hallgrimsson, G.T.; Hansen, J.; Lang, J.; Moreau, J.; Reneerkens, J.; Schmidt, N.M.; Soloviev, M.; ten Horn, J.; Tomkovich, P.S.; Wood, A.G.; Yannic, G.; Bollache, L.; Gilg, O. (2024). Using a common morphometric-based method to sex a migratory bird along its entire flyway despite geographical and temporal variations in body size and sexual size dimorphism. J. Ornithol. 165: 923-934. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-024-02178-9
In: Journal of Ornithology. Springer: Berlin. ISSN 2193-7192; e-ISSN 1439-0361, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Discriminant function; Molecular sexing; East Atlantic flyway; Shorebird; Sanderling

Authors  Top 
  • Pagnon, T.
  • Etchart, L.
  • Teixeira, M.
  • Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X.
  • Hallgrimsson, G.T.
  • Hansen, J.
  • Lang, J.
  • Moreau, J.
  • Reneerkens, J.
  • Schmidt, N.M.
  • Soloviev, M.
  • ten Horn, J., more
  • Tomkovich, P.S.
  • Wood, A.G.
  • Yannic, G.
  • Bollache, L.
  • Gilg, O.

Abstract
    Sexing bird species with monomorphic plumage is generally challenging, and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is often used to develop morphometric-based sexing tools, e.g., using discriminant functions. Within species, local selection pressures, age-related and season-related growth may, however, induce geographical and temporal variations in body size and SSD. Such variations may complicate the development of reliable morphometric-based sexing methods at a broad scale. We first investigated body size variations in a migratory shorebird species with wide breeding and wintering ranges, the Sanderling Calidris alba, within the two breeding populations (Greenland and Russia) and three staging/wintering populations (United Kingdom, Iceland and Mauritania), which belong to the same flyway. Then, for samples from each region, we tested whether site-specific (i.e., “regional”) functions performed better than functions developed for birds from the other sites (i.e., “foreign” functions) or than an overall (“flyway”) function that combined all sampled individuals. We found minor variations in SSD between regions, but significant differences in body size between sexes and regions. Females were larger than males and, for instance, breeders had longer wings than staging and wintering birds. Regional functions had similar sexing efficiency as any other functions applied to sample from each region, except for Western Africa where the regional function performed slightly better than some of the other functions. Furthermore, the flyway function developed after merging all subsamples had a similar efficiency than the regional functions, i.e., from 75.4% to 90% of correct sex assignment depending on the region. Given the small or lack of benefit in using regional functions, we conclude that the flyway function can be used reliably to sex Sanderlings measured at different sites, years or seasons within the East Atlantic flyway. Our results may help to develop global sexing function for other bird species.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors